|
Contact
+ Contact Form
Search
+ Search Form
Introduction
+ Aims & Scope
+ Structure
+ History
Announcements
+ Updates
+ Calls for Papers
+ New Lectures
+ New Publications
Alphabetical Index
+ Author Index
+ Speaker Index
Chronological Index
+ Ancient History
+ Medieval History
+ Modern History
Geographical Index
+ African History
+ American History
+ Asian History
+ European History
+ Oceanian History
Topical Index
+ Prosecution
+ Cases
+ Types
+ Offenders
+ Victims
+ Society
+ Research
+ Representations
Resources
+ Institutions
+ Literature Search
+ Research
|
Start:
Alphabetical Index:
Author Index:
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
H |
I |
J |
K |
L |
M |
N |
O |
P |
Q |
R |
S |
T |
U |
V |
W |
X |
Y |
Z |
Unknown
First published: September 1, 2026 - Last updated: September 1, 2026
TITLE INFORMATION
Author: Lisa Forman Cody
Title: “Marriage is No Protection for Crime”
Subtitle: Coverture, Sex, and Marital Rape in Eighteenth-Century England
Journal: Journal of British Studies
Volume: 61
Issue: 4
Year: October 2022
Pages: 809–834
pISSN: 0021-9371 -
Find a Library: WorldCat |
eISSN: 1545-6986 -
Find a Library: WorldCat
Language: English
Keywords:
Modern History:
18th Century |
European History:
English History |
Types:
Rape /
Marital Rape
FULL TEXT
Links:
- Academia.edu (Free Access)
- Cambridge Core (Free Access)
- ResearchGate (Free Access)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Author:
Lisa Forman Cody,
Department of History,
Claremont McKenna College -
Google Scholar,
ORCID
Abstract:
»If coverture justified patriarchal control and legally erased many aspects of wives’ separate existence, did this mean that husbands in eighteenth-century England also enjoyed absolute authority over their wives’ sexual bodies? This article examines how contemporaries described the sexual boundaries between spouses and what wives could do when they had been violated by their husbands. Wives had few legal protections and limited social and economic resources to escape unwanted marital sex, but the small number who could afford the high costs turned to the ecclesiastical courts to legally separate from their husbands. The five case studies from the ecclesiastical courts explored here are exceptional, first, because sexual problems were at their core, and second, because unusual collateral evidence survives describing attorneys’ and judges’ opinions about spouses’ bodily rights within marriage. Whether they were seeking relief from reproductive toil, venereal infection, threat of sexual violence, or trauma from marital rape, these wives wanted to escape their husbands—but they faced hurdles. Because English ecclesiastical law did not explicitly identify sexual discord as justifying marital separation, the women's attorneys had to demonstrate that unwanted sexual relations were acts of cruelty. By invoking bodily safety, decorum and propriety, and sensibility and sympathy, advocates argued against husbands’ absolute conjugal authority. The author considers how broader transformations in beliefs about gender and sexuality may have resulted in giving wives slightly more room for protection by the second half of the eighteenth century, particularly when they faced the threat of marital rape or venereal infection.«
(Source: Journal of British Studies)
Contents:
| |
Abstract (p. 809) |
| |
Marital Rape as Blind Spot (p. 812) |
| |
Matrimonial Causes in the Ecclesiastical Courts (p. 815) |
| |
Saying No to Venereal Disease (p. 819) |
| |
The Threat of Marital Rape (p. 821) |
| |
A “Love Fit” or Rape? (p. 825) |
| |
“A Man May Commit a Rape on His Own Wife” (p. 830) |
Wikipedia:
History of Europe:
History of England /
Georgian era |
Sex and the law:
Rape /
Marital rape,
Rape in England
|